AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R7 Graphics und NVIDIA NVS 510 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 29% höhere Texturfüllrate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 192
- Etwa 72% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 526.8 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 13.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 1701
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 6.809
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 111.269
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.399
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 7.769
- 9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 9.522
- Etwa 63% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1211
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 976
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1720
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2016 vs 23 October 2012 |
Texturfüllrate | 16.46 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 192 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 526.8 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 1701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 vs 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 vs 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 vs 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 vs 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 vs 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1720 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA NVS 510
- 4x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 797 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 36.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 33.5
- 28.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 33.9
- 28.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 60
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 797 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 vs 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 vs 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 vs 60 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 1701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 1720 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 686 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Codename | Wani | GK107 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2016 | 23 October 2012 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1433 | 1437 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 758 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 200 MHz | 797 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 526.8 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 192 |
Texturfüllrate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,410 million | 1,270 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Länge | 160 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertyp | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 28.51 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1782 MHz |