AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA NVS 510 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 16.46 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 72% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 526.8 gflops versus 306.0 gflops
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 13.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 1701
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 6.809
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 versus 111.269
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 versus 0.399
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 versus 7.769
- 9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 9.522
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 1211
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 976
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1720
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 23 October 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops versus 306.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 1701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 versus 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 versus 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 versus 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1720 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 510
- 4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 36.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 versus 33.5
- 28.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 versus 33.9
- 28.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 versus 60
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 versus 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 versus 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 1701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 1720 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 688 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Wani | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 23 October 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1432 | 1435 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $449 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 797 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz |