AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 M390 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- 4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20250 vs 9276
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 19.079
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 741.303
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 2.516
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 24.513
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 64.492
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 2999
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3321
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 2999
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3321
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 vs 31 May 2010 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 vs 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3321 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 1232
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 vs 1232 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 | 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3321 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2673 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN | Fermi |
Codename | Pitcairn | GF100 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 | 31 May 2010 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 831 | 825 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $279 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $263.28 | |
Typ | Desktop | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 12.73 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Speicherbandbreite | 102.6 GB / s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
Technische Info |
||
Rechenleistung | 30x | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1215 MHz | |
CUDA-Kerne | 352 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 855.4 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 105 °C | |
Leitungssysteme | 352 | |
Texturfüllrate | 26.7 billion / sec | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,100 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
Display-Anschlüsse | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Höhe | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Länge | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI-Optionen | 2-way3-way | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | Two 6-pins |