AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20250 versus 9276
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 19.079
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 741.303
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 2.516
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 24.513
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 64.492
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 2999
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3321
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 2999
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3321
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 versus 31 May 2010 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 versus 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 versus 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 versus 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 versus 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 versus 1232
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 versus 1232
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 versus 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 versus 1232 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 | 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3321 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2673 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Nom de code | Pitcairn | GF100 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 31 May 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 827 | 825 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
Prix maintenant | $263.28 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 102.6 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
Infos techniques |
||
Performance de Compute | 30x | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 352 | |
Performance á point flottant | 855.4 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 352 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 26.7 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way3-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pins |