AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M390 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, API support, Memory, Technologies, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20250 vs 9276
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 19.079
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 741.303
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 2.516
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 24.513
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 64.492
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 2999
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3321
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 2999
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 vs 31 May 2010 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 vs 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 1232
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 vs 1232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 | 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3321 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2673 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Pitcairn | GF100 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 | 31 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 827 | 825 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Price now | $263.28 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.73 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 102.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
Technical info |
||
Compute performance | 30x | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 352 | |
Floating-point performance | 855.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 352 | |
Texture fill rate | 26.7 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins |