AMD Radeon RX 550 vs Intel HD Graphics 530
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 550 und Intel HD Graphics 530 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 550
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- 3.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Etwa 50% höhere Texturfüllrate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 21.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 512 vs 24
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 995
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 254
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 4397
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 30.747
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 330.464
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 1.804
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 19.781
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 30.177
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 1045
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 1045
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 18 April 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 254 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 4397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 30.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 330.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 1.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 19.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 30.177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 1045 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 530
- 336x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 403.2 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 16x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 940
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2158
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 940
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2158
- 3x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 vs 127
| Spezifikationen | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 403.2 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 vs 127 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 254 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 4397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 30.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 330.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 1.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 19.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 30.177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 384 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Codename | Lexa | Skylake GT2 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
| Startdatum | 18 April 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 876 | 1248 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $75 | |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1183 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1.2 TFLOPs | 403.2 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 | 24 |
| Texturfüllrate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Länge | 145 mm | |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 112 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
