AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 11% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Etwa 8% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- Etwa 11% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 791
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77153 vs 74179
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 153.677
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 vs 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 153.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 vs 3357 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 16667
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 252.601
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 3949.565
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 24.769
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1322.129
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 14699
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 14699
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 9486
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 vs 16667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 vs 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 14699 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 vs 9486 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 | 13943 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Turing |
Codename | Navi 10 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $400 | $6,299 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 148 | 112 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 18,600 million |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |