AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT und NVIDIA GeForce MX130 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- 2.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 2321 MHz vs 1122 MHz
- 2.1x mehr Boost-Taktfrequenz: 2581 MHz vs 1242 MHz
- 13854.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 6.7x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2560 vs 384
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- 10.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 1814
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 946 vs 195
- 15.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 100473 vs 6461
- 11.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 31.613
- 17.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 406.203
- 16.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.064 vs 2.034
- 6.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 30.251
- 15.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 107.608
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15315 vs 2796
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3686
- 15.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3357
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15315 vs 2796
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3686
- 15.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3357
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2435 vs 632
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 3 Mar 2021 vs 17 November 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 2321 MHz vs 1122 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 2581 MHz vs 1242 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 2560 vs 384 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 1814 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 vs 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 vs 6461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 vs 31.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 406.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 vs 2.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 30.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 vs 107.608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 vs 2796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 vs 2796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 vs 632 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- 7.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 2.5x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 | 1814 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 | 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 | 6461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 31.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 406.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 2.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 30.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 107.608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 2796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 2796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 | 632 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
Codename | Navi 22 | GM108 |
Startdatum | 3 Mar 2021 | 17 November 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $479 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 51 | 1013 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 2581 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 2321 MHz | 1122 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 2560 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 29.81 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 230 Watt | 30 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17200 million | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 953.9 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Breite | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 384 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 64 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |