AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 76% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:2321 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Etwa 45% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 2581 MHz vs 1777 MHz
- 2.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Etwa 7% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 17107
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 100473 vs 88251
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 299.369
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 4021.382
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.064 vs 28.778
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 188.944
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 1152.664
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3717
- 15.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3356
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3717
- 15.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3356
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2435 vs 1961
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 3 Mar 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 2321 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 2581 MHz vs 1777 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 17107 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 vs 88251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 vs 299.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 4021.382 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 vs 28.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 188.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 vs 1152.664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 vs 1961 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Etwa 40% höhere Leitungssysteme: 3584 vs 2560
- Etwa 35% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 170 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 946
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 15315
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 15315
| Spezifikationen | |
| Leitungssysteme | 3584 vs 2560 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 15315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 15315 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 | 17107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 | 971 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 | 88251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 299.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 4021.382 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 28.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 188.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 1152.664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 22495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 22495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 | 1961 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GA106 |
| Startdatum | 3 Mar 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $479 | $329 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 51 | 134 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 2581 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 2321 MHz | 1320 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 2560 | 3584 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 230 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 17200 million | 13250 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Höhe | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Länge | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Breite | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
| Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 384 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |