AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Vega 3 und Intel UHD Graphics 630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, Speicher, API-Unterstützung, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- 8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 192 vs 24
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 306 vs 302
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 vs 29.514
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1596
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1596
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 February 2018 vs 1 September 2017 |
Leitungssysteme | 192 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 vs 302 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 vs 29.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 vs 1596 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 20% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- Etwa 20% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 460.8 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 890
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4671 vs 3931
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 vs 10.049
- Etwa 86% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 vs 183.156
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 vs 0.75
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.414 vs 18.933
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1412
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3174
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1412
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3174
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 421 vs 418
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 vs 890 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 vs 3931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 vs 10.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 vs 183.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 vs 0.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 vs 18.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 3174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 3174 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 vs 418 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 890 | 1243 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 | 302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3931 | 4671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 27.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 340.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 1.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 20.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 29.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 421 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Codename | Owl | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Startdatum | 13 February 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1264 | 1219 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 384.0 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 192 | 24 |
Texturfüllrate | 12 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4,940 million | 189 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
Speicher |
||
Speichertyp | System Shared | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |