NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GRID K1 und NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GRID K1
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- 14.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4x 192 vs 384
- Etwa 89% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 4x 326.4 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- 32x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4x 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 28.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1237 vs 43.2
- 11.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 354 vs 31.3
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 319 vs 70.1
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 18 March 2013 vs 12 July 2012 |
Texturfüllrate | 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 4x 192 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4x 326.4 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4x 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1237 vs 43.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 354 vs 31.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 319 vs 70.1 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
- Etwa 6% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:900 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2.9x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 45 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2.8x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5016 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.049 vs 4.591
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 342.738 vs 169.864
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.945 vs 0.336
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.549 vs 8.734
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.128 vs 10.43
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2550 vs 1237
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1938 vs 354
- 12.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3926 vs 319
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 900 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5016 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.049 vs 4.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 342.738 vs 169.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.945 vs 0.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.549 vs 8.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.128 vs 10.43 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2550 vs 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1938 vs 354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3926 vs 319 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K1
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K1 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 651 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1976 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.591 | 11.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 169.864 | 342.738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.336 | 0.945 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.734 | 14.549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.43 | 22.128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1237 | 2550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 354 | 1938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 319 | 3926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1237 | 43.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 354 | 31.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 319 | 70.1 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GRID K1 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Kepler | Kepler |
Codename | GK107 | GK107 |
Startdatum | 18 March 2013 | 12 July 2012 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $4,140 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1525 | 1526 |
Typ | Workstation | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4x 326.4 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 4x 192 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 130 Watt | 45 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4x 4 GB | 512 MB |
Speicherbandbreite | 4x 28.51 GB / s | 80.26 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 4x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1782 MHz | 5016 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | GDDR5 |