NVIDIA GeForce 940M vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce 940M und NVIDIA GeForce 840M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 4% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1072 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1176 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- Etwa 57% höhere Texturfüllrate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Etwa 5% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 903.2 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 vs 1096
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 154 vs 151
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 vs 5771
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 vs 22.848
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 168.449 vs 162.594
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 vs 1.237
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 vs 21.15
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 vs 95.545
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 2085
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 2736
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3191
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 2085
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 2736
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3191
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 vs 503
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 March 2015 vs 12 March 2014 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1072 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1176 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 903.2 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 vs 1096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 vs 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 vs 5771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 vs 22.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 vs 162.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 vs 1.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 vs 21.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 vs 95.545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 vs 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 vs 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 vs 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 vs 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3191 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 vs 503 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 11% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 2002 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2002 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 1096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 5771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 22.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 162.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 1.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 21.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 95.545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3191 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 503 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
Startdatum | 13 March 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1184 | 1235 |
Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1176 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1072 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 903.2 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | medium sized |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |