NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX und NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 7% höhere Texturfüllrate: 7.2 billion / sec vs 6.7 billion / sec
- Etwa 15% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Etwa 13% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.403 vs 13.944
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1583 vs 719
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1639 vs 690
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1583 vs 719
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1639 vs 690
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 30 May 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texturfüllrate | 7.2 billion / sec vs 6.7 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 900 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.403 vs 13.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1583 vs 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1639 vs 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1583 vs 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1639 vs 690 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Etwa 24% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1120 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 96 vs 48
- Etwa 24% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 215.04 gflops vs 172.8 gflops
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 283
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 54
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1875 vs 1490
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.184 vs 3.315
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 172.058 vs 122.375
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.145 vs 7.629
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 859 vs 692
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 859 vs 692
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1120 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 96 vs 48 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 215.04 gflops vs 172.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 523 vs 283 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 54 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1875 vs 1490 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.184 vs 3.315 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 172.058 vs 122.375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.145 vs 7.629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 859 vs 692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 859 vs 692 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 283 | 523 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 54 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1490 | 1875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.315 | 4.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 122.375 | 172.058 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.629 | 8.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.403 | 13.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 692 | 859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1583 | 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1639 | 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 692 | 859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1583 | 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1639 | 690 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.459 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Codename | GF119 | GF108 |
Startdatum | 30 May 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1572 | 1574 |
Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 900 MHz | 1120 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 48 | 96 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 172.8 gflops | 215.04 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 48 | 96 |
Texturfüllrate | 7.2 billion / sec | 6.7 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 20 Watt | 23 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 292 million | 585 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Vision |