NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 und Intel UHD Graphics 620 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- 5x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 45% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 7.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 1042
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 241
- 8.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 4592
- 5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 27.062
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 273.504
- 5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 1.777
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 19.939
- 18x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 31.881
- 7.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 1397
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 878
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2227
- 7.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 1397
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 878
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2227
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 62
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 30 April 2019 vs 1 September 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 vs 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 vs 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 vs 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 vs 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 vs 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 vs 62 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 62 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Generation 9.5 |
Codename | TU107 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Startdatum | 30 April 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $179 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 376 | 1380 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1485 MHz | 300 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 24 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz | |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Speichertyp | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |