NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 45% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 7.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 1042
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 241
- 8.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 4592
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 27.062
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 273.504
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 1.777
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 19.939
- 18x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 31.881
- 7.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2227
- 7.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2227
- 4.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 versus 62
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | TU107 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 1380 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | |
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla K80
