NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

vs

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 5x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 1042
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 241
• 8.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 4592
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 27.062
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 273.504
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 1.777
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 19.939
• 18x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 31.881
• 7.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2227
• 7.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2227
• 4.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

Compare specifications (specs)