NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q und AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1335 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8626 vs 7710
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 34854
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 115.237
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1890.261
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 10.121
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 9258
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 9258
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4905 vs 3782
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 23 April 2019 vs 15 October 2018 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1335 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 vs 7710 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 vs 34854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 vs 115.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 vs 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 vs 10.121 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 vs 3782 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Etwa 2% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1168 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- 4.7x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 662 vs 364
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 149.333 vs 94.964
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 614.542 vs 492.867
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 vs 364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 vs 94.964 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 vs 492.867 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 | 7710 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 662 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 34854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 115.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 149.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 614.542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 | 3782 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | TU116 | Polaris 20 |
Startdatum | 23 April 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 333 | 335 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1335 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1140 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1536 | |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 128.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6600 million | 5,700 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
Länge | 241 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 288.0 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 |