NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1335 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8626 versus 7708
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 versus 34854
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 115.237
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 versus 1890.261
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 versus 10.121
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 9258
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 9258
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4905 versus 3782
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 15 October 2018 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 versus 7708 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 versus 34854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 115.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 versus 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 versus 10.121 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 versus 3782 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1168 MHz versus 1140 MHz
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 662 versus 364
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 149.333 versus 94.964
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 614.542 versus 492.867
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz versus 1140 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 versus 364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 versus 94.964 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 versus 492.867 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 | 7708 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 662 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 34854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 115.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 149.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 614.542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 | 3782 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 335 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 5,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |