NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 und Intel HD Graphics 4400 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- 4.4x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1530 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Etwa 55% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 22 nm
- 22.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 vs 524
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 275
- 27.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 vs 2143
- 24.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 vs 7.844
- 12.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 vs 154.696
- 14x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 vs 0.958
- 12.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 vs 9.084
- 105.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 vs 8.335
- 18.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 817
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1381
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3044
- 18.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 817
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1381
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3044
- 7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1065 vs 152
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 14 March 2019 vs 3 September 2013 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 22 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 vs 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 vs 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 vs 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 vs 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 vs 0.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 vs 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 vs 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 vs 152 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 4400
- 6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 20 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 | 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 | 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 0.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 | 152 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Generation 7.5 |
Codename | TU116 | Haswell GT2 |
Startdatum | 14 March 2019 | 3 September 2013 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $219 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 258 | 1421 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz | 350 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 22 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt | 20 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6,600 million | 392 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 46 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 20 | |
Texturfüllrate | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Länge | 229 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8004 MHz | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |