NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 4.4x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 22 nm
• 22.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 vs 524
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 275
• 27.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 vs 2143
• 24.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 vs 7.844
• 12.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 vs 154.696
• 14x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 vs 0.958
• 12.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 vs 9.084
• 105.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 vs 8.335
• 18.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 817
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1381
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3044
• 18.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 817
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1381
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3044
• 7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1065 vs 152

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• 6x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 120 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11659 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	776 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	58014 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.842 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1902.867 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.408 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	116.183 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	875.838 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1065 152

Compare specifications (specs)