NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 4.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 55% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 22 nm
- 22.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 versus 524
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 versus 275
- 27.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 versus 2143
- 24.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 versus 7.844
- 12.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 versus 154.696
- 14x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 versus 0.958
- 12.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 versus 9.084
- 105.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 versus 8.335
- 18.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 817
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 1381
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3044
- 18.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 817
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 1381
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3044
- 7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1065 versus 152
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 3 September 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 22 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 versus 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 versus 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 versus 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 versus 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 versus 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 versus 0.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 versus 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 versus 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 versus 152 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4400
- 6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 | 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 | 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 0.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 | 152 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 3 September 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 258 | 1421 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 20 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 392 million |
Performance á point flottant | 46 gflops | |
Pipelines | 20 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |