NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Etwa 7% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:980 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1033 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Etwa 7% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 140 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 468
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 3.037
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 3285
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3337
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 3285
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3337
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 980 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1033 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 3.037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3337 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Etwa 31% höhere Texturfüllrate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 78.4 billion / sec
- Etwa 40% höhere Leitungssysteme: 1344 vs 960
- Etwa 24% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 4017
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 11364
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 30.505
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 705.293
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 35.416
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 vs 62.69
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 1307
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 78.4 billion / sec |
Leitungssysteme | 1344 vs 960 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4413 vs 4017 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15375 vs 11364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 vs 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 vs 62.69 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 vs 1307 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 | 1615 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Kepler | Kepler |
Codename | GK106 | GK104 |
Startdatum | 6 September 2012 | 16 August 2012 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $229 | $299 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 740 | 701 |
Jetzt kaufen | $349.99 | $321.99 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 14.35 | 17.34 |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1033 MHz | 980 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 980 MHz | 915 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 960 | 1344 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,981 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 960 | 1344 |
Texturfüllrate | 78.4 billion / sec | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display-Anschlüsse | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | One 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
SLI-Optionen | 3-way | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 144.2 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192-bit GDDR5 | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 6.0 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |