NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 468
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 3.037
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 3285
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 3337
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 3285
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 3337
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 915 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 3.037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3337 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 78.4 billion / sec
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 960
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,981 gflops
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 versus 4017
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 versus 11364
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 versus 30.505
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 versus 705.293
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 versus 35.416
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 versus 62.69
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 versus 1307
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec versus 78.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,981 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4413 versus 4017 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15375 versus 11364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 versus 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 versus 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 versus 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 versus 62.69 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 versus 1307 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 | 1615 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK106 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 6 September 2012 | 16 August 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 740 | 701 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | $321.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | 17.34 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | 980 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 915 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 1344 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |