NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 468
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 3.037
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 3285
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3337
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 3285
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 468 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 3.037 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 78.4 billion / sec
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 960
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 4017
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 11364
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 30.505
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 705.293
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 35.416
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 vs 62.69
- Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 1307
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 78.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 960 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4413 vs 4017 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15375 vs 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 vs 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 vs 62.69 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 vs 1307 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 | 4413 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 468 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 | 15375 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | 36.256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | 1029.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | 3.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | 45.894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | 82.191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 3337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 | 16 August 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $299 |
| Place in performance rating | 740 | 701 |
| Price now | $349.99 | $321.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | 17.34 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 915 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 960 | 1344 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
ATIRadeon E4690
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
