NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 und NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 15% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- 6x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2304 vs 384
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 6.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16112 vs 2433
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 vs 442
- 8.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88096 vs 9864
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 251.703 vs 36.898
- 21.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 vs 170.785
- 19.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 vs 1.373
- 8.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 vs 18.937
- 8.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 vs 160.823
- 6.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 3629
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3684
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3331
- 6.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 3629
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3684
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3331
- 44.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1569 vs 35
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 17 October 2018 vs 17 May 2017 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 2304 vs 384 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 vs 2433 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 vs 442 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 vs 9864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 vs 36.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 vs 170.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 vs 1.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 vs 18.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 vs 160.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 vs 35 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1670 MHz vs 1620 MHz
- 5.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 175 Watt
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1670 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 | 2433 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | 442 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 | 9864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | 36.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | 170.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | 1.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | 18.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | 160.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 | 35 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Turing | Pascal |
| Codename | TU106 | N17P-G1 |
| Startdatum | 17 October 2018 | 17 May 2017 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $69.99 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 151 | 874 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $499.99 | $59.99 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 42.76 | 63.91 |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1620 MHz | 1670 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1228 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 2304 | 384 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 175 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 10,800 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Länge | 229 mm | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||

