NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1228 MHz
- 6x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 6000 MHz
- 6.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16112 versus 2433
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 442
- 8.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88096 versus 9864
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 251.703 versus 36.898
- 21.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 versus 170.785
- 19.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 versus 1.373
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 versus 18.937
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 versus 160.823
- 6.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 3331
- 6.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 3331
- 44.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1569 versus 35
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 versus 17 May 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1228 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 384 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 6000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 versus 2433 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 442 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 versus 9864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 versus 36.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 versus 170.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 versus 1.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 versus 18.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 versus 160.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 versus 35 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1620 MHz
- 5.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 175 Watt
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1620 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 | 2433 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | 442 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 | 9864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | 36.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | 170.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | 1.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | 18.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | 160.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 | 35 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU106 | N17P-G1 |
| Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 | 17 May 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $69.99 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 151 | 874 |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | $59.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | 63.91 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1670 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1228 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||

