NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q und AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- 504.6x mehr Texturfüllrate: 153.8 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GT/s
- 3.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78982 vs 77476
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 330.903 vs 252.601
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.167 vs 24.769
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 vs 14699
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3720
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3369
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 vs 14699
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3720
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3369
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 vs 7 July 2019 |
Texturfüllrate | 153.8 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GT/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78982 vs 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 330.903 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 vs 24.769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3369 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Etwa 96% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Etwa 49% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- Um etwa 33% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16357 vs 13253
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 589
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3461.767
- Etwa 78% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 143.293
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 979.608
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2134 vs 1821
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 vs 13253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 589 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3461.767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 143.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 979.608 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 vs 1821 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13253 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78982 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 330.903 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 143.293 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1821 | 2134 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | RDNA |
Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 7 July 2019 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 144 | 162 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $400 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1282 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 817 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.51 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
Leitungssysteme | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | 121.9 GP/s |
Texturfüllrate | 153.8 GTexel/s | 304.8 GT/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 12000 million | 10.3 B |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | Portable Device Dependent | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 288.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologien |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |