NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 60% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Etwa 47% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Etwa 2% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 84% höhere Texturfüllrate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- Etwa 79% höhere Leitungssysteme: 8704 vs 4864
- Um etwa 25% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25320 vs 20549
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 vs 996
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167693 vs 107152
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 311.869
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 4657.322
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 35.311
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 125
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1477.456
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 27478
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 27478
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17706 vs 11652
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 8704 vs 4864 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25320 vs 20549 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 vs 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 vs 107152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 4657.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 27478 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17706 vs 11652 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 | 25320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 | 1041 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107152 | 167693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 | 17706 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $699 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 101 | 52 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 320 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | 700 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |