NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro P2200 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- 3.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 34.491
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 10550
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3698
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 10550
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3698
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 vs 34.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 vs 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 vs 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3698 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1582 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- 2.4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 5 GB
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 121.124
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 vs 1958.592
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 vs 8.452
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 vs 510.941
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 1676
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 1676
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1582 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 vs 121.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 vs 1958.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 vs 8.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 vs 510.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 1676 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9351 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 898 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32364 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 255.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 2621.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 21.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 34.491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 1376.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Pascal | |
Codename | GP106 | |
Startdatum | 10 June 2019 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 309 | 306 |
Typ | Workstation | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1493 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 | |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4400 million | |
CUDA-Kerne | 3840 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | DisplayPort, HDMI |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 201 mm (7.9") | 10.5 in |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Höhe | 4.4 in | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 5 GB | 12 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 200.2 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 160 bit | 384 bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |