NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 34.491
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 versus 10550
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3698
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 versus 10550
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3698
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 34.491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 versus 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 versus 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3698 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1493 MHz
- 2.4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 5 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 121.124
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 versus 1958.592
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 versus 8.452
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 versus 510.941
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 1676
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 1676
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1493 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 5 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 versus 121.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 versus 1958.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 versus 8.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 versus 510.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 1676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9351 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 898 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32364 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 255.521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 2621.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 21.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 34.491 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 1376.357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 10550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | |
| Nom de code | GP106 | |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 309 | 306 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4400 million | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | DisplayPort, HDMI |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | 10.5 in |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 5 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 384 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P2200 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDFireStream 9250
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
