NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro P620 und AMD Radeon RX 580 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 1% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1266 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Etwa 1% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1354 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- 240.3x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,490 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- 4.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 40 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3695
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3349
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3695
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3349
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 February 2018 vs 18 April 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1266 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1354 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,490 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3349 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580
- 4144.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
- 4.5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2304 vs 512
- 4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 60% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 3670
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 549
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 12475
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 43.877
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 vs 773.248
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 3.082
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 53.425
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 184.343
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 3575
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 3575
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 2304 vs 512 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 vs 3670 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 vs 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 vs 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 vs 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 vs 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 vs 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 3575 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | GP107 | Polaris 20 |
Startdatum | 1 February 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 583 | 341 |
Jetzt kaufen | $176.99 | $169.99 |
Typ | Workstation | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 25.53 | 76.21 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $229 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1354 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1266 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,490 gflops | 6.2 TFLOPs |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 512 | 2304 |
Texturfüllrate | 46.56 GTexel / s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 40 Watt | 185 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,300 million | 5,700 million |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 145 mm | 241 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 8-pin |
Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 64.19 GB / s | 256 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |