NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1257 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1354 MHz versus 1340 MHz
- 240.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- 4.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 3695
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3349
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 3695
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3349
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1257 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz versus 1340 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 46.56 GTexel / s
- 4.5x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 512
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 3670
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 549
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 12475
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 43.877
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 773.248
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 3.082
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 53.425
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 184.343
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 3575
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 3575
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 512 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 3670 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 versus 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 3575 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | GP107 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 341 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $169.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 76.21 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 6.2 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 2304 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 185 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 256 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |