NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 und AMD Radeon Pro 555X Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Etwa 59% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 907 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.7x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 5100 MHz
- 5.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 12516
- 13.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 35.283
- 8.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 668.308
- 13.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 3.158
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 49.593
- 9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 170.952
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 4093
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2350
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 4093
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2350
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 907 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 5100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 vs 12516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 vs 35.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 vs 668.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 vs 3.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 vs 49.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 vs 170.952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3351 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- 3.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 12516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | 35.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | 668.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | 3.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | 49.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | 170.952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | TU102 | Polaris 21 |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 | 16 July 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 112 | 981 |
Typ | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz | 907 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 18,600 million | 3,000 million |
Leitungssysteme | 768 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Länge | 267 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 8-pin | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 5100 MHz |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 |