NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 versus AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and AMD Radeon Pro 555X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

  • Environ 59% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 907 MHz
  • Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
  • 2.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 5100 MHz
  • 5.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 versus 12516
  • 13.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 35.283
  • 8.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 668.308
  • 13.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 3.158
  • 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 versus 49.593
  • 9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 170.952
  • 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 4093
  • Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 2350
  • 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 4093
  • Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 2350
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 1440 MHz versus 907 MHz
Processus de fabrication 12 nm versus 14 nm
Vitesse de mémoire 14000 MHz versus 5100 MHz
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL 74179 versus 12516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 488.989 versus 35.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5451.006 versus 668.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 41.461 versus 3.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 153.677 versus 49.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1534.582 versus 170.952
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19571 versus 4093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 versus 2350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 versus 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19571 versus 4093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 versus 2350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 versus 3351

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555X

  • 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt versus 250 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
74179
12516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
488.989
35.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5451.006
668.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
41.461
3.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
153.677
49.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1534.582
170.952
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19571
4093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
2350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19571
4093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
2350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3351
Nom NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 AMD Radeon Pro 555X
PassMark - G3D Mark 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark 791
Geekbench - OpenCL 74179 12516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 488.989 35.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5451.006 668.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 41.461 3.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 153.677 49.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1534.582 170.952
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19571 4093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 2350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19571 4093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 2350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 13943

Comparer les caractéristiques

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Essentiel

Architecture Turing GCN 4.0
Nom de code TU102 Polaris 21
Date de sortie 13 August 2018 16 July 2018
Prix de sortie (MSRP) $6,299
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 112 981
Genre Workstation Mobile workstation

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 1770 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 1440 MHz 907 MHz
Processus de fabrication 12 nm 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt
Compte de transistor 18,600 million 3,000 million
Pipelines 768

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C No outputs

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Longeur 267 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires 2x 8-pin None

Soutien API

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Mémoire

Vitesse de mémoire 14000 MHz 5100 MHz
Largeur du bus mémoire 128 Bit
Genre de mémoire GDDR5