NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 versus AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and AMD Radeon Pro 555X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 59% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 907 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 5100 MHz
- 5.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 versus 12516
- 13.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 35.283
- 8.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 668.308
- 13.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 3.158
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 versus 49.593
- 9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 170.952
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 4093
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 2350
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 4093
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 2350
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 907 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 5100 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 versus 12516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 35.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 668.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 3.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 versus 49.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 170.952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 12516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | 35.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | 668.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | 3.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | 49.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | 170.952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU102 | Polaris 21 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 16 July 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 112 | 981 |
Genre | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz | 907 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 3,000 million |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 5100 MHz |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |