NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A4000 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 51% höhere Texturfüllrate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s
- Etwa 71% höhere Leitungssysteme: 6144 vs 3584
- Etwa 21% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 140 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Um etwa 33% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 17107
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 971
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 88251
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 299.369
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 4021.382
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 28.778
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 1152.664
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2604 vs 1961
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Texturfüllrate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Leitungssysteme | 6144 vs 3584 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 vs 17107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 vs 971 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 vs 88251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 299.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 4021.382 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 28.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 1152.664 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 vs 1961 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Etwa 80% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1320 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 14% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1777 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Etwa 7% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 162.131
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 22050
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 22050
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 162.131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 17107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 971 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 88251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 299.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 4021.382 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 28.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 188.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1152.664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 22495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 22495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 1961 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
| Codename | GA104 | GA106 |
| Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 108 | 134 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1560 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz | 1320 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 3584 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 13250 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Formfaktor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Länge | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 300 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
