NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA T400 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA T400
- Etwa 38% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1425 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 2.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1425 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Etwa 75% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:735 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 2.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s
- 6.7x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2560 vs 384
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 20% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 17019
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 58.805
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 785.059
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 3.961
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 53.111
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 vs 222.15
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 5088
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2173
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 5088
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2173
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz vs 420 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s |
| Leitungssysteme | 2560 vs 384 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 vs 17019 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 vs 58.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 vs 785.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 vs 3.961 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 vs 53.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 vs 222.15 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 5088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 5088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3346 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 | 57885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 229.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 2082.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 16.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 134.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 599.217 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Turing | Ampere |
| Codename | TU117 | GA106 |
| Startdatum | 6 May 2021 | 11 May 2021 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 851 | 276 |
| Typ | Laptop | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1425 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 420 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 2560 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 22.80 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | 12000 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Formfaktor | Single-slot | IGP |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 80.00 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA T400 mit anderen
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAT400 vs
AppleM2 8-core
