NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57639 vs 16960
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 227.936 vs 58.805
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2031.737 vs 785.059
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.93 vs 3.961
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 121.562 vs 53.111
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 568.183 vs 222.15
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 5088
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2173
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 5088
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2173
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 420 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57639 vs 16960 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 227.936 vs 58.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2031.737 vs 785.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.93 vs 3.961 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 121.562 vs 53.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 568.183 vs 222.15 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 5088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 5088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16960 | 57639 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 227.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 2031.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 15.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 121.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 568.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10141 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5420 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Code name | TU117 | GA106 |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 11 May 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 901 | 270 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T400 with others
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
