AMD A10-9620P vs AMD A8-3500M

Comparative analysis of AMD A10-9620P and AMD A8-3500M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Memory, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD A10-9620P

AMD A8-3500M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9620P

CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 42% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 56% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1266 vs 813
Around 81% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2535 vs 1400
Around 54% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 384 vs 250
Around 38% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1040 vs 753
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 983 vs 805
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 983 vs 805

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 January 2017 vs 14 June 2011
Maximum frequency	3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1266 vs 813
PassMark - CPU mark	2535 vs 1400
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	384 vs 250
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1040 vs 753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	983 vs 805
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	983 vs 805

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3500M

2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2610 vs 887
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5455 vs 4373
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2610 vs 887
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5455 vs 4373

Specifications (specs)
L2 cache	4096 KB vs 2 MB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2610 vs 887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	5455 vs 4373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2610 vs 887
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	5455 vs 4373

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10-9620P
CPU 2: AMD A8-3500M

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1266

813

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

2535

1400

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

384

250

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

1040

753

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

983

805

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

887

2610

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4373

5455

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

983

805

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

887

2610

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4373

5455

Name	AMD A10-9620P	AMD A8-3500M
PassMark - Single thread mark	1266	813
PassMark - CPU mark	2535	1400
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	384	250
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1040	753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	983	805
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	887	2610
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4373	5455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	983	805
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	887	2610
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4373	5455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		1.766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4.312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		8.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1.745

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A10-9620P	AMD A8-3500M
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge	Llano
Launch date	1 January 2017	14 June 2011
Place in performance rating	1805	1850
Series	Bristol Ridge	AMD A-Series
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	250 mm	218 mm
L2 cache	2 MB	4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Maximum core temperature	90 °C
Maximum frequency	3.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
Number of cores	4	4
Number of threads	4	4
Transistor count	3100 Million	1000 Million
L1 cache		128 KB (per core)
Compatibility
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration		1
Sockets supported		FS1
Memory
Supported memory types		DDR3
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)