AMD A8-3800 vs Intel Celeron E3400
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-3800 and Intel Celeron E3400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3800
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1066 vs 1004
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2049 vs 860
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 338 vs 301
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1184 vs 510
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | June 2011 vs January 2010 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1066 vs 1004 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2049 vs 860 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 338 vs 301 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1184 vs 510 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E3400
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-3800
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E3400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-3800 | Intel Celeron E3400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1066 | 1004 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2049 | 860 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 338 | 301 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1184 | 510 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A8-3800 | Intel Celeron E3400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Llano | Wolfdale |
Launch date | June 2011 | January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 2750 | 2740 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $76 | |
Price now | $75.47 | |
Processor Number | E3400 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.63 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 228 mm | 82 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 228 million |
Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM1 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring |