AMD A9-9400 SoC vs AMD Athlon II X2 265

Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9400 SoC and AMD Athlon II X2 265 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9400 SoC

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1332 vs 1290

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 265

• Around 38% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1341 vs 1199

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A9-9400 SoC
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II X2 265

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1199 1341
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1332 1290

Compare specifications (specs)