AMD A9-9410 vs AMD A8-5550M
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9410 and AMD A8-5550M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9410
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10-25/25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1334 vs 1039
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1817 vs 369
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2686 vs 924
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.735 vs 10.477
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 922 vs 634
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 922 vs 634
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2016 vs 12 March 2013 |
Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1334 vs 1039 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 vs 369 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 vs 924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 vs 10.477 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 922 vs 634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 922 vs 634 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-5550M
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1869 vs 1528
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.83 vs 2.294
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7.997 vs 4.731
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.148 vs 0.108
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.546 vs 2.184
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2542 vs 1061
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6126 vs 5532
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2542 vs 1061
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6126 vs 5532
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1869 vs 1528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.83 vs 2.294 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.997 vs 4.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 vs 0.108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.546 vs 2.184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2542 vs 1061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6126 vs 5532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2542 vs 1061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6126 vs 5532 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9410
CPU 2: AMD A8-5550M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A9-9410 | AMD A8-5550M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1334 | 1039 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1528 | 1869 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 | 369 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 | 924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.294 | 3.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.731 | 7.997 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | 0.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 | 10.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.184 | 2.546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 922 | 634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1061 | 2542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 | 6126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 922 | 634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1061 | 2542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 | 6126 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A9-9410 | AMD A8-5550M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Richland |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
Launch date | 1 June 2016 | 12 March 2013 |
OPN Tray | AM9410AFY23AC | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in performance rating | 1735 | 1710 |
Series | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.9 GHz | |
Compute Cores | 5 | |
Die size | 124.5 mm | 246 mm |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1200 Million | 1178 million |
Unlocked | ||
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 3 | |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | FP4 | FS1r2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |