AMD A9-9425 vs AMD FX-9590
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9425 and AMD FX-9590 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9425
- Around 58% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 57°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 14.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2034 vs 633
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3077 vs 3042
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.324 vs 25.735
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.615 vs 0.45
- 9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.577 vs 1.418
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.717 vs 8.59
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C vs 57°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 vs 633 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 vs 3042 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 vs 25.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 vs 0.45 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.577 vs 1.418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 vs 8.59 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-9590
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
- Around 35% higher clock speed: 5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1812 vs 1331
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6785 vs 1527
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.765 vs 7.781
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB vs 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1812 vs 1331 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6785 vs 1527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.765 vs 7.781 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9425
CPU 2: AMD FX-9590
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9425 | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1331 | 1812 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1527 | 6785 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 | 633 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 | 3042 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 | 10.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 | 25.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 | 0.45 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.577 | 1.418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 | 8.59 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 943 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1243 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3556 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 943 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1243 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3556 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A9-9425 | AMD FX-9590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Vishera |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 2Q18 | July 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM9425AYN23AC | FD9590FHW8KHK |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1566 | 2299 |
| Series | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| OPN PIB | FD9590FHHKWOF | |
| Price now | $99.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.03 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Die size | 124 mm | 315 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 57°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 8 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | 1200 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| L3 cache | 8 MB | |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Sockets supported | AM3+ | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | n / a |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A9-9425 with others
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelCore i5-4570TE
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelCore i5-6198DU
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDA4-9120
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelXeon E5-2648L v2
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDRX-427BB
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
