AMD C-60 vs AMD Athlon X2 L310

Comparative analysis of AMD C-60 and AMD Athlon X2 L310 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD C-60

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher clock speed: 1.33 GHz vs 1.2 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 13 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 L310

• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 395 vs 354
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 329 vs 290
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 120 vs 108
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 213 vs 197

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD C-60
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 L310

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	354 395
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	290 329
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	108 120
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	197 213

Compare specifications (specs)