AMD E2-3800 vs AMD Phenom II X2 N660

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-3800 and AMD Phenom II X2 N660 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3800

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1152 vs 1083
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 548 vs 444

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X2 N660

• Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1093 vs 436
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 264 vs 156

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-3800
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X2 N660

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	436 1093
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1152 1083
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	156 264
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	548 444

Compare specifications (specs)