AMD E2-9000 vs AMD Pro A8-8600B
Comparative analysis of AMD E2-9000 and AMD Pro A8-8600B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E2-9000
- CPU is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1227 vs 780
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1227 vs 780
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3313 vs 2559
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3313 vs 2559
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 vs 3 June 2015 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1227 vs 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1227 vs 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3313 vs 2559 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3313 vs 2559 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Pro A8-8600B
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 36% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1107 vs 814
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2226 vs 950
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 713 vs 514
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 713 vs 514
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1107 vs 814 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2226 vs 950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 vs 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 vs 514 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E2-9000
CPU 2: AMD Pro A8-8600B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD E2-9000 | AMD Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 814 | 1107 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 950 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 514 | 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 514 | 713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1227 | 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1227 | 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3313 | 2559 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3313 | 2559 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.764 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.849 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.472 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.061 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD E2-9000 | AMD Pro A8-8600B | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Carrizo |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 | 3 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1897 | 1906 |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 124.5 mm | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1200 Million | 3100 Million |
| Base frequency | 1.6 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Unlocked | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Sockets supported | FP4 | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 720 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 384 | |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
