AMD EPYC 9754 vs Intel Core Duo T2500
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 9754 and Intel Core Duo T2500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9754
- CPU is newer: launch date 17 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 126 more cores, run more applications at once: 128 vs 2
- 254 more threads: 256 vs 2
- Around 55% higher clock speed: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 65 nm
- 64x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2329 vs 613
- 318.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 130045 vs 408
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs January 2006 |
| Number of cores | 128 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 256 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 65 nm |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 2048 KB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2329 vs 613 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 130045 vs 408 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo T2500
- 11.6x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 360 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 360 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 9754
CPU 2: Intel Core Duo T2500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 9754 | Intel Core Duo T2500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2329 | 613 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 130045 | 408 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Intel Core Duo T2500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 | January 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $11900 | $120 |
| Place in performance rating | 53 | 2837 |
| Architecture codename | Yonah | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Processor Number | T2500 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.13 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.25 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Die size | 8x 73 mm² | 90 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 128 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 256 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 71,000 million | 151 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 667 MHz FSB | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 667 MHz | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| VID voltage range | 1.1625V - 1.30V | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1 |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 320-400 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | SP5 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 360 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||