AMD Opteron 6308 vs Intel Xeon W3520
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 6308 and Intel Xeon W3520 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 6308
- Around 10% higher maximum core temperature: 74.40°C vs 67.9°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 10x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.902 vs 0.887
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.41 vs 0.281
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.802 vs 4.1
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.40°C vs 67.9°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB vs 8192 KB (shared) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.902 vs 0.887 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.41 vs 0.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.802 vs 4.1 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W3520
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 47.416 vs 20.184
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.482 vs 1.163
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 192 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 47.416 vs 20.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.482 vs 1.163 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron 6308
CPU 2: Intel Xeon W3520
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Opteron 6308 | Intel Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.902 | 0.887 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.184 | 47.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.41 | 0.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.163 | 1.482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.802 | 4.1 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1272 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2924 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 479 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1908 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron 6308 | Intel Xeon W3520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD Opteron | |
| OPN Tray | OS6308WKT4GHK | |
| Place in performance rating | 3017 | 2793 |
| Series | AMD Opteron 6300 Series Processor | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield | |
| Launch date | March 2009 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $404 | |
| Price now | $28.75 | |
| Processor Number | W3520 | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 51.83 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.40°C | 67.9°C |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 4.8 GT/s QPI | |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz | |
| Number of QPI Links | 1 | |
| Transistor count | 731 million | |
| VID voltage range | 0.800V-1.375V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory frequency | 2000 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 800/1066 |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 3 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | G34 | FCLGA1366 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 42.5mm x 45.0mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Opteron 6308 with others
AMDOpteron 6308 vs
AMDOpteron 152
AMDOpteron 6308 vs
AMDOpteron 150
AMDOpteron 6308 vs
IntelXeon 5160
AMDOpteron 6308 vs
IntelXeon X3440
AMDOpteron 6308 vs
AMDOpteron 2419 EE
AMDOpteron 6308 vs
IntelXeon X3450
