AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 42% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.288 vs 0.522
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.208 vs 0.138
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.745 vs 3.829
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | November 2009 vs January 2007 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.288 vs 0.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.208 vs 0.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.745 vs 3.829 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.255 vs 11.963
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.748 vs 0.424
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.255 vs 11.963 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.748 vs 0.424 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.288 | 0.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.963 | 24.255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.208 | 0.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.745 | 3.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.424 | 0.748 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 330 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1019 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Deneb | Kentsfield |
| Launch date | November 2009 | January 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 3281 | 3279 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | Q6600 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 258 mm | 286 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 758 million | 582 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | B3=62.2°C; G0=71°C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.500V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) with others
AMDPhenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs
IntelPentium D 930
AMDPhenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs
AMDAthlon 64 X2 4200+
AMDPhenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs
AMDAthlon 64 X2 5200+
AMDPhenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs
IntelPentium D 925
AMDPhenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs
AMDPhenom X4 9950 BE (140W)
AMDPhenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs
IntelAtom D525
