AMD RX-225FB vs AMD A10-4600M
Comparative analysis of AMD RX-225FB and AMD A10-4600M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD RX-225FB
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 93650% higher clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 3.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.411 vs 3.171
- 24.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 175.137 vs 7.18
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.606 vs 0.162
- 13.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 25.166 vs 1.896
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 May 2014 vs 15 May 2012 |
Maximum frequency | 3000 MHz vs 3.2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.411 vs 3.171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 175.137 vs 7.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.606 vs 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 25.166 vs 1.896 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-4600M
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.506 vs 7.094
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1078 vs 794
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1938 vs 892
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 192 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1 MB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.506 vs 7.094 |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1078 vs 794 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1938 vs 892 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD RX-225FB
CPU 2: AMD A10-4600M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD RX-225FB | AMD A10-4600M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.411 | 3.171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 175.137 | 7.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.606 | 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.094 | 13.506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 25.166 | 1.896 |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 794 | 1078 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 892 | 1938 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 354 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3279 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3279 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD RX-225FB | AMD A10-4600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bald Eagle | Trinity |
Family | AMD R-Series | |
Launch date | 20 May 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 2104 | 2051 |
Processor Number | RX-225FB | |
Vertical segment | Embedded | Laptop |
Series | AMD A-Series | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2200 MHz | |
Die size | 928 mm2 | 246 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3000 MHz | 3.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1303 Million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 464 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 533 MHz | |
Number of pipelines | 192 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon R4 Graphics | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 4 | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Compatibility |
||
Configurable TDP | 15-17 Watt | |
Package Size | micro-BGA | |
Sockets supported | BGA (FP3) | FS1r2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD Mantle API | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |