AMD Sempron 2650 vs AMD Phenom II X4 925
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 2650 and AMD Phenom II X4 925 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2650
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.724 vs 1.088
- 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 84.309 vs 10.457
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.31 vs 0.197
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.811 vs 3.231
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.724 vs 1.088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.309 vs 10.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.31 vs 0.197 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.811 vs 3.231 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 925
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1151 vs 477
- 4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2271 vs 574
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 vs 151
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1147 vs 253
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1151 vs 477 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2271 vs 574 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 vs 151 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1147 vs 253 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 2650
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 925
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Sempron 2650 | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 477 | 1151 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 574 | 2271 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 151 | 357 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 253 | 1147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.724 | 1.088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.309 | 10.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.31 | 0.197 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.811 | 3.231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Sempron 2650 | AMD Phenom II X4 925 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Family | AMD Sempron | |
OPN PIB | SD2650JAHMBOX | |
OPN Tray | SD2650JAH23HM | |
Place in performance rating | 2820 | 2883 |
Series | AMD Sempron Dual-Core APU | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture codename | Deneb | |
Launch date | May 2009 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $43.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.90 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 1.45 GHz | |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 258 mm | |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | |
Transistor count | 758 million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | |
Supported memory frequency | 1333 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 400 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 128 | |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | AM1 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 95 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |